Bezos Explains Why The Washington Post Has Stopped Endorsing Presidential Candidates

Newspaper endorsements don’t impact elections but reinforce the sense of bias, the owner of the Post said

The Washington Post has dropped its decades-long tradition of endorsing a US presidential candidate, a move designed to rebuild trust with the public, according to its owner, billionaire Jeff Bezos. Bezos detailed his rationale in an op-ed published by the Post on Monday, following strong pushback from current and former staff members. 

The newspaper has been endorsing candidates since 1976, but announced the suspension of the practice on Friday, leading to the resignations of several editors. The Post’s editorial board endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020. According to CNN, the Post’s staff members had drafted an endorsement of the Democratic candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris, which was ultimately not approved by management. 

Bezos began his Monday’s op-ed by citing a recent Gallup poll, which found that nearly 70% of Americans have little or no trust in the media. “Our profession is now the least trusted of all. Something we are doing is clearly not working,” the entrepreneur wrote, adding that “most people believe the media is biased.” 

“Presidential endorsements do nothing to tip the scales of an election,” he continued. “What presidential endorsements actually do is create a perception of bias. A perception of non-independence. Ending them is a principled decision, and it’s the right one.”

The founder of Amazon and aerospace manufacturer Blue Origin acknowledged that the decision to drop endorsements so close to Election Day on November 5 was the result of “inadequate planning.” At the same time, he maintained that neither campaign had influenced his decision-making, and that the move to abandon endorsements was not connected to last week’s meeting between Republican presidential candidate, former President Donald Trump, and Blue Origin top executives in Austin, Texas. 

A total of 21 of the Post’s opinion columnists signed a statement, calling the non-endorsement “a terrible mistake.” They argued that “this isn’t the right moment, when one candidate is advocating positions that directly threaten freedom of the press and the values of the Constitution.” 

Three of the newspaper’s 10-person editorial board have since stepped down. More than 200,000 people – or about 8% of the Post’s paid subscribers – had canceled their digital subscription by midday on Monday, according to NPR. The decision to end endorsements was criticized by many prominent journalists, including the Post’s former longtime executive editor Marty Baron. 

Last month, Patrick Soon-Shiong, the owner of the Los Angeles Times, announced that the newspaper would also not be making presidential endorsements. The move faced similar backlash, with editorials editor Mariel Garza resigning in protest.

Throughout his campaign, Trump has criticized “the lying media” for what he said was a long history of unfair coverage of him and his time in office. The Harris campaign and allies have similarly accused pro-Trump media outlets of amplifying “desinformation.”